.
 
 
Home

Events

Events

Teams

Community and Economic Development

Decision and Communications Technology

Environmental Science and Policy

Literacy and Community Service Networks

Water Resources

Programs and Public Affairs

Regional Development

Retirement and Intergenerational Studies


Publications

Presentations

Opinion

Insight

People

Brochure

STI Location
 
 

ENSURING A COMPETITIVE REVENUE SYSTEM
FOR SOUTH CAROLINA

This report is a summary of the major findings of the research project, Evaluation of the South Carolina Revenue System, which was prepared for the Palmetto Institute. It was authored by Holley H. Ulbrich, principal investigator on the project and Alumni Professor of Economics Emerita, Clemson University and Senior Fellow of the Strom Thurmond Institute.

Get the report.

PROJECT GOALS AND METHODS

A revenue system is one of many elements that contribute to a state's competitiveness. Competitiveness means maintaining and enhancing South Carolina's attractiveness as a place to work, to invest, and to live in comparison to other locations. The state and local government revenue system of taxes, fees, and debt management has an important role to play in competitiveness -- not in the narrow sense of how low can the tax burden be but rather in a broader, more complex sense that considers the role of public revenue as part of a larger system.

What level of revenue do state and local governments need to provide the public infrastructure and services that households and businesses seek? How do governments raise that revenue in ways that are both equitable (fair distribution of the burden) and efficient (encouraging productive activities and discouraging undesirable ones)? How do these choices compare with choices made in other states? How is the state's revenue system impacted by changes in the underlying economy? What adaptations must be made to keep the revenue system adequate, equitable, and efficient over time?

In addressing these questions, the Strom Thurmond Institute explored government revenue in South Carolina from multiple perspectives: theoretical, historical, institutional, economic, political, and statistical. The research compared levels and distribution of revenue sources with those in other states, especially neighboring states. This exploration resulted in seven working papers by six researchers, which will be released over the coming weeks. Links to these working papers are below.

.

This page is maintained by Thomas Rourke
The person responsible for this web site server is Patrick Harris
©1998 Strom Thurmond Institute

.